Solidarité Maroc, 13/12/2025
The United
Arab Emirates (UAE) are preparing to launch a large-scale economic offensive in
Western Sahara, a territory classified by the United Nations as a
non-self-governing territory and largely occupied by Morocco since 1975. By
aligning themselves with the USA, through public financial mechanisms and
private companies, Abu Dhabi is contributing to the institutionalisation of
illegal economic exploitation, in direct violation of international law.
An
economy built against international law
Western
Sahara is recognised by the United Nations (UN) as a territory whose
decolonisation process has never been completed. In the absence of a
self-determination referendum, Morocco has no internationally recognised
sovereignty over the territory.
As early as
1975, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) established that no ties of
territorial sovereignty exist between Western Sahara and Morocco. Since then,
UN and European jurisprudence has been consistent: any exploitation of natural
resources in a non-self-governing territory is illegal without the free and
explicit consent of the people concerned — in this case, the Sahrawi people.
Yet the
projects currently under negotiation:
- are carried out without any
consultation of the Sahrawi people,
- completely exclude the
Polisario Front, recognised by the UN as the legitimate representative of
the Sahrawi people,
- rely exclusively on Moroccan
institutions imposed in the occupied territory.
United
Arab Emirates: investors and political actors
The main
Emirati actors involved are two major sovereign wealth funds:
- ADQ (Abu Dhabi Developmental
Holding Company):
a public holding company controlling strategic assets of the Emirates.
- ADIA (Abu Dhabi Investment
Authority):
one of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, chaired by Tahnoun bin
Zayed Al Nahyan, brother of Emirati President Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan
(MbZ).
Both are
already deeply embedded in Morocco and are seeking to expand their investments,
particularly in renewable energy, presented as “sustainable” and politically
acceptable.
Renewable
energy as a legal smokescreen
Discussions
focus primarily on the development of wind farms in Western Sahara, led by
major Emirati companies in the sector:
- Masdar, a public Emirati renewable
energy company;
- Amea Power, a private company active in
wind and solar energy;
- Taqa (Abu Dhabi National Energy
Company), a
public energy giant recently partnered with the Moroccan group Nareva,
itself controlled by the Moroccan royal holding Al Mada.
The choice
of renewable energy is not neutral. It allows illegal exploitation to be
concealed behind environmental rhetoric, even though international law makes no
distinction between fossil and renewable resources: any exploitation without
consent is unlawful.
Local
institutions: a façade of legitimacy
Negotiations
are conducted with the Regional Investment Centre (CRI) of Dakhla-Oued Edahab,
a Moroccan administrative body tasked with promoting investment in the region.
Its director, Ahmed Kathir, acts as a local relay for policies decided in
Rabat.
These
institutions have no international legitimacy. They serve to manufacture an
appearance of local governance, designed to circumvent the fundamental
requirement of consulting the Sahrawi people.
The
central role of the USA
The USA
play a decisive role in this dynamic. The DFC has announced funding of up to
USD 5 billion to support the establishment of US companies in Dakhla.
At the same
time, Washington is preparing to open a consulate in Dakhla, following the
visit of a diplomatic delegation. This move extends the unilateral recognition,
in 2020, of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara by the Trump
administration — a recognition with no international legal value, but with
significant political consequences.
A
strategy of faits accomplis
Through
this convergence between Rabat, Abu Dhabi and Washington, an economy of faits
accomplis is taking shape. Its objective is clear: to make Morocco’s occupation
of Western Sahara irreversible through investment, infrastructure and economic
integration.
This
strategy aims to hollow out the UN process, marginalise international law, and
transform a military occupation into a normalised economic reality.
Shared
legal and political responsibility
By engaging
in these projects, the United Arab Emirates and the USA expose themselves to
indirect legal responsibility by participating in the exploitation of an
occupied territory. The companies involved may also face future litigation, as
several European groups already have before EU courts.
Far from
being a purely economic issue, Western Sahara remains one of the last cases of
unfinished decolonisation, where international investment is now being used to
circumvent — rather than uphold — the right of peoples to self-determination.





Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire